Impactul mediului acustic asupra comunicării în sala de clasă
The impact of acoustic environment on communication in classroom setting
Diana TODIȚĂ SYLVANDER
regardless whether it refers to adults or children, normally developed or with different types of disabilities.
This study examines several acoustical microbarriers, such as: noise, reverberation and speaker-listener distance, and the impact of these variables on the speech perception abilities of both children with hearing loss and children with normal hearing.
From a practical standpoint, we discussed several methods for eliminating some of these communication barriers, such as improving the acoustical environment in the classroom and managing student’s behavior.
The study also presents some of the effects of the acoustical environment on the children’s academic achievement, as well as behavior when speech perception is compromised, ending with suggestions on using smart technology applications for monitoring the noise level hence the student’s behavior in the classroom.
Keywords: Semantic network, hearing impairment, vocabulary
Published on line: 15/03/2016
American National Standard Institute (2000). Classroom Acoustics- A Resource for Creating Learning Environments with Desirable Listening Conditions,http://asa.aip.org/classroom/booklet.html-
American Speech and Hearing Language Association (2016). Classroom-Acoustics,http://www.asha.org/public/hearing/Classroom-Acoustics/2015.
Arsenault, P.J. (2013). Whole System Acoustical Treatments Improving Indoor Environmental Quality, Green Schools, 3.
Chiriacescu, A. (2003). Comunicare interumană. Comunicarea în afaceri. Negociere, București: Editura ASE.
Crandell, C.C., Smaldino, J.J. (2000). Classroom Acoustics for Children with Normal Hearing and with Hearing Impairment, ASHA, Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, Vol. 31, 362-370;
Crandell, C.C., Smaldino, J.J. (2000, a). Assistive Technologies for The Hearing Impaired in Sandlin, R. (2000). Textbook of Hearing Aid Amplification: Technical and Clinical Considerations (2nd ed.), San Diego, CA: Singular Press.
Jones, F. (2000).Tools for Teaching, Hong-Kong: Frederic H. Jones & Associates, Inc., 29-38.
Lieu, J.E. (2004). Speech-Language and Educational Consequences of Unilateral Hearing Loss in Children, Archives Otolaryngology Head Neck Surgery, 13, 524-530;
National Education Association (2016). Virtual Classroom Management, http://www.nea.org/tools/virtual-classroom-management.html.
Nelson, P. et al. (2004). Classroom Noise and Children Learning Through a Second Language, ASHA, Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, Vol. 26, 219-229.
Neveanu, P.P., Zlate, M., Creţu, T. (1990). Psihologie, București: Editura Didactică și Pedagogică, p. 64.
Popescu, E. B., Smigelschi, M., Pana, R. (2003). Ministerul transporturilor, constructiilor și turismului, Direcția generală tehnică în construcții- “Normativ privind protecția la zgomot”, 19-24.
Sabo, L. (2015). Bariere in comunicare, http://documents.tips/documents/bariere-de-comunicare.html.
Shield, B.M., Dockrell, J.E. (2003). The Effects of Noise on Children at School: A Review, J. Building Acoustics 10(2), 97-106.
Wong, H. K., Wong, R. T. (1998). The First Days of School, Mountain View: Harry K. Wong Publications, Inc., 83-89.
World Health Organization (1999). Guidelines for Community Noise, (http://www.who.int/peh/).