O perspectivă logopedică asupra tranziției către școlaritate a copilului cu implant cohlear

O perspectivă logopedică asupra tranziției către școlaritate a copilului cu implant cohlear

A speech and language therapy approach on the transition towards school level in children with cochlear implantat

Ovidiu Cristian TUDOREAN, Alois GHERGHUȚ
Abstract

Cochlear implant (CI) is a medical procedure originally developed in the United States. In Romania, it is part of the national programme for the treatment of deafness with implantable hearing aids managed by the National Health Insurance House. Successful implantation transforms the child with hearing loss into a hearing but not a speaking child. Only with systematic support and guidance will the child become a speaker. It is risky to assume that the development of the child with CI follows the same milestones and has to overcome the same challenges as the typical child. In fact, successful integration into mainstream school must be considered a separate objective, which will be prepared and actively pursued during the child’s pre-school years by the child’s educational partners (family – teachers – speech therapist). Spontaneous development is not guaranteed; moreover, there is a risk of losing the child’s development potential. This is why the preparation of the family, the child with CI, the teachers and even the school as a physical environment is essential for a successful start at school. This paper aims to provide a brief contextualisation of cochlear implantation and also answers some pressing questions for an optimal transition to schooling. It considers building and strengthening the self-image of the child with CI, developing personal autonomy, training and developing conversational skills, investigating options related to school choice, getting to know the school and future teachers, forming and developing the prerequisites for schooling, pragmatic suggestions for involving the family in school activities, but also for involving teachers in the school integration of the child with CI

Keywords:cochlear implant; family-centred practice; transition from preschool to school
pdf

DOI:10.26744/rrttlc.2023.9.1.06
Published on line: 03/31/2023


References
Anca, M. (2007). Metode și tehnici de evaluare a copiilor cu CES. Cluj-Napoca: Presa Universitară Clujeană
Bodea-Hațegan, C. & Popescu, T. (2021). Album logopedic. Grupuri consonantice. Cluj-Napoca: Editura ASTTLR
Bodea-Hațegan, C. (2022). Tulburările de voce și vorbire: evaluare și intervenție. Cluj-Napoca: Editura ASTTLR
Calmels, M.-N., Saliba, I., Wanna, G., Cochard, N., Fillaux, J., Deguine, O., & Fraysse, B. (2004). Speech perception and speech intelligibility in children after cochlear implantation. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 68(3), 347-351. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2003.11.006
DesJardin, J. L., & Eisenberg, L. S. (2007). Maternal Contributions: Supporting Language Development in Young Children with Cochlear Implants. Ear and hearing, 28(4), 456-469. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e31806dc1ab
Erikson, E. H. (1993). Childhood and Society. W. W. Norton.
McCauley, R. J., Strand, E., Lof, G. L., Schooling, T., & Frymark, T. (2009). Evidence-based systematic review: effects of nonspeech oral motor exercises on speech. Am J Speech Lang Pathol, 18(4), 343-360. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2009/09-0006)
Mitra, G. & Mogoș, A. (1977). Dezvoltarea calităților motrice. București: Editura Sport-Turism
Molina Roldán, S., Marauri, J., Aubert, A., & Flecha, R. (2021). How Inclusive Interactive Learning Environments Benefit Students Without Special Needs. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661427
Mudry, A., & Mills, M. (2013). The Early History of the Cochlear Implant. JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, 139(5), 446. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2013.293
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders. (2016). NIDCD fact sheet: Cochlear implants [NIH Pub. No. 00-4798]. www.nidcd.nih.gov/sites/default/files/Documents/health/hearing/FactsheetCochlearImplants.pdf
Park, L. R., Gagnon, E. B., & Brown, K. D. (2021). The Limitations of FDA Criteria: Inconsistencies with Clinical Practice, Findings, and Adult Criteria as a Barrier to Pediatric Implantation. Seminars in Hearing, 42(04), 373-380. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1739370
Perrin, E., Berger-Vachon, C., Topouzkhanian, A., Truy, E., & Morgon, A. (1999). Evaluation of cochlear implanted children’s voices. International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, 47(2), 181-186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-5876(98)00140-2
Reinders, H. (2010). Towards a Classroom Pedagogy for Learner Autonomy: A Framework of Independent Language Learning Skills. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(5). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2010v35n5.4
Sarant, J. Z., Holt, C. M., Dowell, R. C., Rickards, F. W., & Blamey, P. J. (2008). Spoken Language Development in Oral Preschool Children With Permanent Childhood Deafness. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 14(2), 205–217. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enn034
Thordardottir, E., & Weismer, S. E. (2002). Content Mazes and Filled Pauses in Narrative Language Samples of Children with Specific Language Impairment. Brain and Cognition, 48(2–3), 587–592. https://doi.org/10.1006/brcg.2001.1422
World Health Organization. (1993). The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: Diagnostic criteria for research.
Woźnicka, E., Niebudek-Bogusz, E., Kwiecień, J., Wiktorowicz, J., & Sliwinska-Kowalska, M. (2012). Applicability of the vocal tract discomfort (VTD) scale in evaluating the effects of voice therapy of occupational voice disorders. Medycyna Pracy, 63(2), 141–152.

Home

Home


Programul national de tratament al surditatii prin proteze auditive implantabile (implant cohlear si proteze auditive). (n.d.). http://www.casan.ro/page/programul-national-de-tratament-al-surditatii-prin-proteze-auditive-implantabile-implant-cohlear-si-proteze-auditive.html
World Report on Hearing. (2021, March 2). https://www.who.int/teams/noncommunicable-diseases/sensory-functions-disability-and-rehabilitation/highlighting-priorities-for-ear-and-hearing-care