Dezvoltarea abilităţilor de comunicare printr-un program de intervenţie bazat pe LSR (Limba Semnelor Române) şi simboluri grafice

Dezvoltarea abilităţilor de comunicare printr-un program de intervenţie bazat pe LSR (Limba Semnelor Române) şi simboluri grafice

Developing the communication skills through an intervention program based on LSR (Romanian Sign Language) and graphic symbols


The aim of this study is to create and to assess the efficiency of an intervention program based on Sign language and graphic symbols. The research had a comparative design pre-post-follow-up intervention. The participants to the program were deafblind/MSI students and the data proved there were significant differences between the pre-intervention, post-intervention and follow-up stage at the sign language level and at the graphic symbols acquired by the students.

Keywords:communication skills, Sign Language, graphic symbols, deafblind/multisensorial impairement, intervention program


DOI: 10.26744/rrttlc.2020.6.1.04

Published on line: 15/03/2020

Ashton, G., Cagle, K., Kurz, K., Newell, W., Peterson, R., & Zinza, J. (2011).Standards for Learning American Sign Language (ASL) in the 21st Century. In Standards for Foreign Language Learning in the 21st Century. Yonkers, NY, disponibil online la (consultat în 25.02.2020)
Anca, A. (2006). Psihologia deficienţilor de auz. Cluj Napoca: Presa Universitară Clujeană.
Birkett, E. (1984). A comparative Study of the Effects of makaton Vocabulary and a Language Stimulation Programme on the Communication Abilities of Mentally Handicapped Adults. Glasgow: Department of English Language, University of Glasgow.
Bodea Hațegan, C. (2011). Abordări structuralist-integrate în terapia tulburărilor de limbaj și comunicare, Cluj-Napoca: Presa Universitară Clujeană.
Boulet, L. (1999). Effectiveness of Pictures Communication Symbols in the Acquisition of Specific American Sign Language Vocabulary by Deaf Students with Intellectual Disabilities. The University of British Columbia.
Brown, D (1997) Trends in the population of children with multi-sensory impairment. Talking Sense, 43, 2.
Conaghan, B.P.; Singh, N.N.; Moe, T.J. & Ellis, C.R. (1992). Acquisition and Generalization of Manual Signs by Hearing Impaired Adults with Mental Retardation. Journal of Behavioral Education, 2, 175-203.
Fărcaş, I. (2012) Aspecte psiholingvistice ale comunicării prin limbajul semnelor gestuale în cazul persoanelor cu surdocecitate, Teza de doctorat, UBB Cluj.
Griffith, P.; Panagos J. & Robinson, J.H. (1990). Tactile Iconicity: Signs Rated for Use with Deafblind Children. În: H. Bornstein (Ed.): Manual Communication: Implications for Education.Washinton: Gallaudet University Press.
Griffith, P.L. & Robinson, J. H. (1980). A comparative and normative study of iconicity of signs rated by three groups. American Annals of the Deaf, 126, 440-449.
Hathazi, A. (2014). Dezvoltarea abilităţilor de comunicare la copiii cu surdocecitate. Colecţia: Educarea persoanelor cu dizabilităţi multiple. Editura: Presa Universitară Clujeană.
Jameel, H. T. & Bibi, S. (2016). Benefits of sign language for the deaf students in classroom learning. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences. 3. 24-26.
Malloy, T.V.(2003) Sign Language Use for Deaf, Hard of Hearing, and Hearing Babies: The Evidence Supports It, American Society for Deaf Children, disponibil online la (consultat în 25.02.2020)
Mann, W; Haug, T.; Kollien, S.; Quinto-Pozos, D. (2015). Teaching Signed Languages. DOI:10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal1436(consultat în 25.02.2020).
Rowland, C., & Stremel-Campbell, K. (1987). Share and share alike: conventional gestures to emergent language for learners with sensory impairments. În: L. Goetz, D. Guess, & K. Stremel-Campbell (Eds.), Innovative program design for individuals with dual sensory impairments. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Stillman, R.D. & Battle, C.W. (1986). Developmental assessment of communicative abilities in the deaf-blind. În: Sensory Impairment in Mentally Handicapped People. Ellis, D. (Ed.). London: Croom Helm.
Stillman, R.D. (1978). The Callier-Azusa Scale – G. Dallas: The Callier Center for Communication Disorders, University of Texas.
Tufar, I. (2015) Sisteme de comunicare alternative şi augmentative, în Adrian Roşan (coord.): Psihopedagogie specială: Modele de evaluare și intervenție, Iași: Polirom.