Protocol de evaluare a disgrafiei

Protocol de evaluare a disgrafiei

Protocol for assessing dysgraphia

Daniela ROMILĂ
Abstract

Handwriting is a motor perceptive skill acquired through practice (Feder, Majnemer, 2017) which, once it became automatic and organized, is a valid tool that facilitates the development of ideas. Writing difficulties are considered as reasons for guiding school children towards assessment, therapy and intervention services.
This research aims to investigate the psychomotor peculiarities of children with dysgraphia and to develop a protocol for the assessment of dysgraphia based on empirical evidence. For the structure of the evaluation protocol, samples such as the Nepsy battery (Korkman, Kirk, Kemp, 1998), psychomotricity assessment samples, and samples for evaluating the accuracy and speed of writing on a horizontal and vertical plane by using the Wacom Intuos Pro tablet and the SMART board were used.
The research targets third-grade students from two schools in the city of Mediaş, who were selected in a controlled manner to establish the control group and other randomly selected students for the target group, thus selecting 22 research participants.
Keywords: autism spectrum disorder, language and communication disorders in ASD, alternative and augmentative communication strategies, visual clues, echolalia

pdf

DOI: 10.26744/rrttlc.2024.10.1.03
Published on line: 03/31/2024
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mintal disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
Barnett, A., Henderson, S.E., Scheib, B. & Schulz, J. (2007). Detailed Assessment of Speed of Handwriting (DASH): Pearson.
Bodea-Hațegan, C., Talaș, D., Trifu, R. (2016). Dispraxia. Studiu privind problematica dispraxiei în ţara noastră. Revista Română de Terapia Tulburărilor de Limbaj și Comunicare, Vol. 2, Nr. 1.
Schneck, C., Amundson, S. (2010). Prewriting and handwriting skills.
David, C., Roșan, A. (2017). Repere diagnostice bazate pe dovezi științifice în tulburările specifice de învățare. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Argonaut&Limes.
Dayan, E., Cohen, L. G. (2011). Neuroplasticity subserving motor skill learning Neuron. 72 p. 443-454.
Feder, K. P., Majnemer, A. (2007). Handwriting development, competency, and intervention. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 49, p. 312-317.
Gibbs, J., Appleton, J. and Appleton, R. (2007). Dyspraxia or developmental coordination disorder? Unravelling the enigma. (Arch Dis Child. 2007 Jun; 92 (6): 534–539).
Goyen, T., Duff, S. (2005). Discriminant validity of the developmental test of visual-motor integration in relation to children with handwriting dysfunction. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 52, p. 109-115.
http://www.asha.org/PracticePortal/Clinical-Topics/Childhood-Apraxia-ofSpeech/.
Krings, F. (2014). (Psiho)Motricitate. Sprijin, prevenție și compensare. Cluj-Napoca: Editura Asociației de Științe Cognitive din România.
Radu, I. D. (2000). Educația psihomotorie a deficienților mintali – îndrumător metodic. București: Editura Pro Humanitate.
Radu, I. D. și Ulici, G. (2003). Evaluarea și educarea psihomotricității copiilor cu dificultăți psihomotorii de integrare. București: Editura Fundației Humanitas.
Romilă, A. coordonator științific. (2003). DSM IV – Manual de diagnostic și statistică a tulburărilor mentale – Ediția a IV-a, text revizuit. București: Editura Asociației Psihiatrilor Liberi din România.
Roșan, A. coordonator. (2015). Psihopedagogie specială. Modele de evaluare și intervenție. Iași: Editura Polirom.
Tseng, M., Chow, S. (2000). Perceptual-motor function of school-age children with slow handwriting speed. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, p. 83-88.
Vlad, E. (2000). Evaluarea în actul educațional – terapeutic. București: Editura Pro Humanitate.
Vrăsmaș, E. (1999). Educația copilului preșcolar. Elemente de pedagogie la vârsta timpurie. București: Editura Pro Humanitate.
Wilhelm, I., Prehn-Kristensen, A., Born, J. (2012). Sleep-dependent memory consolidation–what can be learnt from children? Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, p. 1718-1728.