linguistic abilities

Învățarea explicită bazată pe metode didactice interactive utilizate pentru înțelegerea lecturi

Explicit learning based on interactive pedagogical methods used for reading comprehension

Oana PREDA
Abstract

Explicit learning based on interactive pedagogical methods used for reading comprehension.
When choosing the pedagogical strategies meant to foster the formation and the development of reading comprehension skills it is essential to detect the roots and the specifics of dysfunctions in the cognitive processes and competences that might affect reading comprehension. The personalized and systematic use of interactive pedagogical methods has a positive impact on: enriching the pupils’ vocabulary with novel words and expressions; understanding the anaphoric reference items that feature in clauses and sentences; making lexical, causal and pragmatic inferences so as to understand clauses and sentences; acknowledging discourse markers; building a global representation of the text; employing meta-cognition while monitoring textual comprehension; accessing the significance of the text; understanding and using the text’s structure in order to critically interpret and assess the information read.

Keywords: language, linguistic abilities, early interventions, language stimulations, speech-therapy methods, cognitive education, personalized programs
pdf

DOI: 10.26744/rrttlc.2020.6.2.06
Published on line: 30/10/2020

References:
Alvarez-Canizo, M., Suarez-Coala, P., Cuestos, F. (2015). The role of reading fluency in children’s text comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1-8 doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01810 (accesat în 14.11.2019)
Bianco, M. (2015 a). Du language oral à la comprehension de l’écrit. Grenoble: P.U.G.
Bianco, M. (2015 b). Pratiques pédagogiques et performances des élèves:language et apprentissage de la langue écrite. Rapport pour Conseil national devaluation du systeme scolaire (CNESCO). http://www.cnesco.fr. (accesat în 23.11.2019)
Cain, K., Oakhill, J., Barnes, M. Bryant, P. (2001). Comprehension skill, inference-making ability and their relation to knowledge. Memory and Cognition, 29(6), p. 850-859.
Cain, K. (2012). Abilitatea de a citi. Dezvoltare și dificultăți. Cluj-Napoca: Editura ASCR.
Henderson, L., Snowling, M., Clarke, P. (2013). Accesing, integrating, and inhibiting word meaning in poor comprehenders. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(3), 177-198. doi:10,1080/10888438.2011.652721 (accesat în 25.10.2019).
Luke, S.G., Henderson, J.M., Ferreira, F. (2015). Children’s eye-movements during reading reflect the quality of lexical representations: an individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 41(6), 1675-1683.doi:10.1037/xlm000.133. (accesat în 28.11.2019).
Nation, K., Snowling, M.J. (1998). Semantic Processing and the Development of Word-Recognition Skils: Evidence from Children with Reading Comprehension Difficulties. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(1): 85-101.
Perfetti, C.A (2007). Reading ability: lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of reading. 11 (4): 357-383.
Perfetti, C.A., Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading. Scientific Studies of reading, 18(1), 22-37.doi:10.1080/10888438.2013.827687 (accesat în 20.11.2019).

Dezvoltarea limbajului: procese cognitive implicate, evaluare şi intervenţii educative

The development of language: cognitive processes involved, assessment and educative interventions

Vasile Radu PREDA
Abstract

The development of language: cognitive processes involved, assessment and educative interventions. This study is an interdisciplinary approach for development of language and learning strategies, based on the constructivist theory, linguistic theory and differential pedagogy. For language development is necessary: a) a good assessment of language with psychological procedures, methods and instruments; b) early stimulations of the linguistic abilities (phonological and phonemic awareness, phonological segmentation, verbal memory) and of oral, reading and writing communication with speech-therapy methods and educative personalized programs.

Keywords:language, linguistic abilities, early interventions, language stimulations, speech-therapy methods, cognitive education, personalized programs
pdf

DOI: 10.26744/rrttlc.2020.6.1.06

Published on line: 15/03/2020

References:
Adams, A.M., Gathercole, S.E. (2000). Limitations in working memory: Implications for language development.
Bodea-Haţegan, C. (2015). Tulburările de limbaj şi comunicare. În: A. Roşan (coord.). Psihopedagogie specială. Modele de evaluare şi intervenţie. Bucureşti, Polirom, p.212-243.
David, C., Roşan, A. (2017). Repere diagnostice bazate pe dovezi ştiinţifice în tulburările specifice de învăţare. Cluj-Napoca, Editurile Argonaut şi Limes.
David, C., Roşan, A. (2019). Intervenţii psihopedagogice în tulburările specifice de învăţare. Învăţăm FonoLogic – program structurat de antrenament al conştiinţei fonologice bazat pe dovezi ştiinţifice. Bucureşti, Polirom.
Dehn, M. (2008). Working Memory and Academic Learning. Assessment and Intervention. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sosns, Inc.
De Jong, P.F., van der Leij, A. (2003). Developmnetal changes in the manifestation of a phonological deficit in dyslexic children learning to read a regular orthography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 1: 22 – 40.
Demont, E., Botzung, A. (2003). Contribution de la conscience phonologique et de la mémoire de travail aux difficultés en lecture : étude auprès d’enfants dyslexiques et apprentis lecteurs. L’Année Psychologiues, 103, 3 : 377 – 409.
Demont, E., Gombert, J.E. (2007). Relations conscience phonologique et apprentissage : peut-on sortir de la relation circulaire. În : E. Demont, M.N. Metz-Lutz (Eds.). L’acquisition du langage et ses troubles. Marseille, Solal : 47-79.
Gathercole, S.E., Baddeley, A. D. (1990). Phonological memory deficits in language disorders of children: Is there a causal connection? Journal of Memory and Language, 29, p. 336-360.
Gathercole, S.E., Baddeley, A. D. (1993). Working memory and language. Hillszside, N.J.: Lawrence Erbaum.
Gathercole, S.E., Service, E., Hitch, G.J., Adams, A-M., Martin, A.J. (1999). Phonological Short-term Memory and Vocabulary Development: Further Evidence on Nature of the Relationship. Applied Cognitive Psychlogy, vol. 13: 65 – 77.
Gombert, J.E., Colé, P. (2000). Activités métalinguistiques, lecture et illetrisme. În : M. Kail, M. Fayol (Eds). L’acquisition du langage : le langage au-delà de 3 ans. Vol. 2. Paris. PUF : 117-150.
Gough, P., Hillinger, M.L. (1980). Learning to read: An unnatural act. Bulletin of the Orton Society, 30: 170-196.
Lecocq, P. (1991). Apprentissage de la lecture et dyslexie. Buuxelles : Mardaga.
Mazeau, M. (1999). Dysphasies, trouble mnésiques, syndrome frontal chez l’enfant. Paris, Masson, p.111-113.
Preda O. (2010). Particularităţi ale asociaţiilor verbale la deficienţii mintali. În: V.Preda (coord.). Dinamica educaţiei speciale. Cluj Napoca. Presa Universitară Clujeană, p. 173-188.
Rondal, J.A. (1999). Langage oral. În: J.A. Rondal, X. Seron (sous la direction), Troubes du language. Bases théoriques, diagnostic et rééducation. Sprimont, Mardaga, p. 375-412.
Rondal, J.A., Esperet, E., Gombert, J-E, Thibaut, J-P, Comblain, A. (1999). Développement du language oral. În : J.A. Rondal et E. Esperet (sous la direction). Manuel de psychologie de l’enfant. Sprimont, Mardaga, p. 479-564.
Rondal, J.A. (2001). Developpement et fonctionnement langagier.În : J.A.l Rondal, A. Comblain (sous la direction) Manuel de psychologie des handicaps. Sémiologie et princopes de remédiation. Sprimont, Mardaga, p.81-138.
Slama-Cazacu,T. (1973). Cercetări asupra comunicării. Bucureşti:Editura Academiei.
Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2003). Apprentissage de la lecture et dyslexie. Médicine et Enfance : 249-253.