Afazia în contextul multilingv: Abordare din perspectivă psiholingvistică

Afazia în contextul multilingv: Abordare din perspectivă psiholingvistică

Aphasia in multilingual context-a psycholingusitic approach

Mălina ȘOGOR
Abstract

To begin with, the first sign depicted on people with aphasia is a language disorder, acquired after a damage to the central nervous. The existing studies in this area explain the roots of aphasia throughout a medical and phonological perspective, while the psycholinguistic approach is considerably more narrowed.
Taking into consideration the increasing number of people who are speaking more than one language and who are at risk of developing a medical condition that can lead to aphasia and other associated communication deficiencies, it is critical for speech-language pathologists to assess the situation from different angles, particularly to incorporate medical, linguistic and psycholinguistic viewpoints.
The aim of this article is emphasizing the main approaches which are being addressed in explanation of language production and understanding how bilingual persons are affected by aphasia, whereas a complex and multilingual approach is crucial to be taken into consideration during the intervention.

Keywords: communication, speech and language therapy, multiple disabilities, reflection journal, individualised approaches

 

References
Bodea Hațegan, C. B. (2016). Afazia. Delimitări simptomatologice, direcții de evaluare și intervenție. În C. B. Hațegan, Logopedia: Terapia tulburărilor de limbaj. Structuri deschise (pg. 370-472). București: Editura Trei.
Ansaldoa, A. I., Marcottea, K., Schererc, L., & Raboyeaua, G. (2008). Language therapy and bilingual aphasia: Clinical implications of psycholinguistic and neuroimaging research. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 539-557.
Baker, E., Croot, K., McLeod, S., & Paul, R. (2001). Psycholinguistic Models of Speech Development and Their Application to Clinical Practice. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 685-702.
Lorenzen, B., & Murray, L. L. (2008). Bilingual Aphasia: A Theoretical and Clinical Review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 299-317.
Fabbro, F. (2001). The Bilingual Brain: Bilingual Aphasia. Brain and Language, 201-210.
Kay, J., Lesser, R., & Coltheart, M. (1996). Psycholinguistic assessments of language processing in aphasia (PALPA): An introduction. Aphasiology, 159-215.
Hallowell, B. (2022). Aphasia and other acquired neurogenic language disorders : a guide for clinical excellence. San Diego: Plural Publishing.
Hayden, S. (2022). Using the System approach for Aphasia: An introduction for Speech and Language Therapists. New York: Routledge.
Edwards, S. (2005). Fluent Aphasia. Edinburgh: Cambridge University Press.
Bemania, Z., Moayedfarb, S., & Ghasisin, L. (2021). Psycholinguistic variables influencing word retrieval in Persian-speaking people with aphasia. Aphasiology, 1-15.
Peñaloza, C., Martin, N., Laine, M., & Rodríguez-Fornells, A. (2022). Language learning in aphasia: A narrative review and critical analysis of the literature with implications for language therapy. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

Specificul activităților de terapia limbajului și a comunicării în contextul dizabilității multiple: strategii și resurse personalizate

Specificul activităților de terapia limbajului și a comunicării în contextul dizabilității multiple: strategii și resurse personalizate

The SLT specificity in multiple disabilities: personalized strategies and resources

Ioana ȘERBAN, Andreea HATHAZI
Abstract

Students with multiple disabilities may present many challenges regarding their development in areas such as cognition, language and communication, social interaction, emotional abilities, literacy, or behaviour. The speech and language therapist is a member of the multidisciplinary team which assesses, plans, and implements specific intervention programs for children with multiple disabilities. Most of these children are strongly dependent on their parents, teachers, or therapists for every activity they carry out through the day. Depending on their communication behaviour or patterns with a certain partner, children with multiple disabilities require individualized and/or personalized programmes of communication which may include specific strategies. This paper will present the differences between individualised and personalized approaches and will propose a reflective-based tool for assessment and intervention centred on developing communication abilities for children with multiple disabilities.

Keywords: communication, speech and language therapy, multiple disabilities, reflection journal, individualised approaches

 

Published on line: 03/31/2022

Reference
Bruce, S.M, Janssen, M.J., & Bashinski, S.M. (2016). Individualizing and Personalizing Communication and Literacy Instruction for Children who are Deafblind. Journal of Deafblind Studies on Communication. 2:73-87.
Desch LW, & Gaebler-Spira, D. (2008). Council on Children with Disabilities. Prescribing assistive-technology systems: focus on children with impaired communication. Pediatrics.121(6):1271–1280
Düzkantar, A., Öğülmüş, K., Altın, D., & Görgün, B. (2020). Review of International Studies on Multiple Disabilities, Sakarya University Journal of Education, 10(3), 532-559. doi: https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.670873.
Fogel, A. (1993). Developing through relationships. Origins of communication, self, and culture. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Grove, N., Bunning, K., Porter, J., & Olsson, C. (1999). See What I Mean: Interpreting the Meaning of Communication by People with Severe and Profound Intellectual Disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 12(3): 190-203.
Hathazi, A. (2015). Dizabilitățile multiple. În A.Roșan (coord.), Psihopedagogie specială. Modele de evaluare și intervenție, (187-211). Iași: Polirom.
Hostyn, I., & Maes, B. (2009). Interaction between persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities and their partners: A literature review. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 34(4), 296–312.
Houtrow, A., & Murphy, N. (2019); AAP COUNCIL ON CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES. Prescribing Physical, Occupational, and Speech Therapy Services for Children with Disabilities. Pediatrics. 143(4): e20190285.
Janney, R. E. & Snell, M. E. (2011). Designing and implementing instruction of inclusive classes. In M. E. Snell and F. Brown (Eds.). Instruction of students with severe disabilities. 7th Edition. ( 224-256). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
Kucirkova, N., Messer, D., & Whitelock, D. (2010). Shared personalised books: A practical solution to the challenges posed by home book reading interventions. Literacy Information and Computer Education Journal, 1(3), 186-19.
Martens, M. A. W., Janssen, M. J., Ruijssenaars, W. A. J. J. M., Huisman, M. & Riksen- Walraven, J. M. (2014). Intervening on affective involvement and expression of emotions in an adult with congenital deafblindness. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 36, 12- 20.
Miles, B. (2005). Literacy for persons who are deaf-blind. https://nationaldb.org/library/page/1935.
Miles, B. & Riggio. M. (Eds.). (1999). Remarkable conversations: A guide to developing meaningful communication with children and young adults who are deafblind, Watertown, MA: Perkins School for the Blind.
Nelson, C., van Dijk, J., McDonnell, A. P., & Thompson, K. (2002). A framework for understanding children with severe multiple disabilities. The van Dijk approach to assessment. Research & Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 37 (2), 97-111.
Ostrosky, M.M., Donegan, M.M., & Fowler, S.A. (1998). Facilitating transitions across home, community, work, and school. In A. M. Wetherby, S. F. Warren, & J. Reichle (Eds.), Transitions in prelinguistic communication (437-470). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
Rensfeldt Flink, A., Åsberg Johnels, J., Broberg, M. & Thunberg, G. (2020): Examining perceptions of a communication course for parents of children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities, International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, DOI: 10.1080/20473869.2020.1721160
Roche, L.; Sigafoos, J.; Lancioni, G. E.; O’Reilly, M. F.; Green, V. A. (2015). Microswitch Technology for Enabling Self-Determined Responding in Children with Profound and Multiple Disabilities: A Systematic Review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 1–13. doi:10.3109/07434618.2015.1024888
Roche, L. (2017). Evaluating and Enhancing Communication Skills in Four Adolescents with Profound and Multiple Disabilities. Doctoral Thesis. Victoria University of Wellington.
Romski, M., Sevcik, R.A., Adamson, L.B., Smith, A., Cheslock, M., & Bakeman, R. (2011). Parent Perceptions of the Language Development of Toddlers with Developmental Delays Before and After Participation in Parent-Coached Language Interventions. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 20, 111–118.
Ruppar, A. L., Gaffney, J. S., & Dymond, S. K. (2015). Influences on teachers’ decisions about literacy for secondary students with severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 81(2), 209-226.
Van Keer, I., Colla, S., Van Leeuwen, K., Vlaskamp, C., Ceulemans, E., Hoppenbrouwers, K., Desoete, A., & Maes, B. (2017). Exploring parental behavior and child interactive engagement: A study on children with a significant cognitive and motor developmental delay. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 64, 131–142.
Warren, S., Brady, N. (2007). The role of maternal responsivity in the development of children with intellectual disabilities. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews 13(4):330-338.
Wilder J, Granlund M. (2003). Behaviour style and interaction between seven children with multiple disabilities and their caregivers. Child Care Health Dev. 29:559–67.
Wilder, J. (2014). Communication with children and adolescents with multiple disabilities: A systematic review. Kalmar: Nationellt Kompetenscentrum Anhoeriga (NKA).
*** American Speech Language Hearing Association. (2016) – ASHA practice policy: scope of practice in speech-language pathology.

Rolul jocului didactic în dezvoltarea autonomiei personale la elevii cu dizabilități severe

Rolul jocului didactic în dezvoltarea autonomiei personale la elevii cu dizabilități severe

The role of didactic game in developing self-autonomy for children with severe disabilities

Minodora SÎRBU
Abstract

This article presents the role of the didactic play in developing personal autonomy in students with severe disabilities. The didactic games applied to students with severe disabilities highlight the way in which the didactic game can contribute to the development of personal autonomy by developing adaptive daily life skills.

Keywords: personal autonomy, didactic play, intellectual disabilities, curative pedagogy, multiple disabilities.

pdf

DOI: 10.26744/rrttlc.2020.6.1.07

Published on line: 15/03/2020

References:

Bocoș, M.D. (2013). Instruirea interactivă”, Iași: Editura Polirom.
Golășie, M. (2018). Jocul în pedagogia curativă, în Catalano, H., Albulescu, I. (coord.), (2018). Pedagogia jocului și a activităților ludice, pag. 274-285, București: Editura Didactică și Pedagogică.
Hathazi, A. (2015), Dizabilitățile multiple, în Roșan, A. (coord.), (2015). Psihopedagogie specială. Modele de evaluare și intervenție, pag. 187-241, Iași: Editura Polirom.
Roșan, A., Bălaș-Baconschi, C. (2015). Dizabilitatea intelectuală, în Roșan, A. (coord.), (2015). Psihopedagogie specială. Modele de evaluare și intervenție, pag. 99-122, Iași: Editura Polirom.

Speech therapy approaches

Direcţii logopedice de evaluare şi intervenţie în contextul sindromului Laurence-Moon-Bardet-Biedel

Speech therapy approaches for assessment and intervention in Laurence-Moon-Bardet-Biedel syndrome

Cecilia MACRI
Abstract
This article presents a case study of Laurence-Moon-Bardet-Biedel syndrome. The main objectives of this research are to underline the developmental features and to propose an assessment and intervention approach focused on speech and language therapy in the situation of this rare syndrome. Results demonstrated that an adequate assessment, focused on basic concepts and a specific individualized intervention approach can ensure functional development even if the pathology is complex.
Keywords: multiple disabilities, Laurence-Moon-Bardet-Biedel syndrome, individualized therapeutic approach, speech and language therapy
pdf

DOI: 10.26744/rrttlc.2015.1.1.03

Published on line: 15/10/2015

References:

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.

Bodea-Hațegan, C., Talaș, D., Pași prin lumea sunetelor. (2015) https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=ppls.pps.com.ppls

Bodea Haţegan, C. (2013). Tulburări de voce şi vorbire. Evaluare şi intervenţie, Cluj-Napoca: Presa Universitară Clujeană.

Bodea Haţegan, C. (2015). Tulburările de limbaj şi comunicare, în Roşan, A. (2015). Psihopedagogia specială, Evaluare şi intervenţie, Iaşi: Polirom.

Dindelegan, C.M. (2006). Elemente de psihopatologie şi psihologie clinică, Ediţia a II-a, Oradea: Editura Universitatii din Oradea.

Gafencu, M., Doros, G., Puiu, M., Micle, I., Popoiu, A., Serban, M. (2005). Laurence-Moon-Bardet-Biedl syndrome- case presentation, European Journal of Human Genetics, Nature Publishing Group, vol. 13. supp. 1, pp 137.

Mitrofan, I. (2003). Cursa cu obstacole a dezvoltării umane, Iaşi: Editura Polirom.

Vrăşmaş, E., Stănică, C. (1997). Terapia tulburărilor de limbaj. Intervenţii logopedice, Bucureşti: Editura Didactică şi Pedagogică, Bucureşti.